Tying for First at The US Amateur Team East 2014

The US Amateur Team East is held every year in Parsippany, NJ.  It’s the most well-attended annual team tournament in the country with ~1200 players showing up in 278 teams this year, and by far dwarfing other similar regional tournaments across the country!  Here’s an excerpt taken from a related USCF article regarding the main rule: “The four-player teams (some come with alternates as well) must average below 2200 and play in board-order.”  USCF coverage of the event can be viewed here and here.


The Cake Came out Early 🙂 .  The Tournament coincided with the 75th anniversary celebration of USCF, and everyone was treated to a sumptuous cake and coffee. Happy B’day USCF!

Our team average was  2197, and I believe we were third seed beginning the tournament. Not bad for four school kids! It was the first time I was playing this tournament.  I was Board 1 for our team called “What does the GM say?  CheckCheckCheckmate!” (I know it’s lame, but it wasn’t my idea 🙂 ).  On the Superbowl weekend, when I decided to play, I was thinking of something like “The Lords of the Kings!” 🙂 (if it hadn’t been used in the past).  There were some pretty cool team names, and the one which was quite topical and voted best was “NSA is Perpetually Checking.”

Our team captain was Grant Xu playing on Board 2.  He was the mastermind behind the compiling of a high average rating.  On Board 3 was Siddharth Arun, and on Board 4 was Jason Tang.  So this was our team of School children from Grades 10, 11, 9 and 6, respectively. I knew Grant, but had never met my other teammates.  All three of them were from MA, while I was a local NJ player.  I was a late addition to the team – a roster change.  Less than two weeks before the tournament Grant approached me through this blog for a fill-in, since the original Board 1 could no longer play.

Akshat Chandra and Grant Xu

Akshat Chandra and Grant Xu

In the first round we played the Bad News Bishops, and won 3-1.  I played Ed Kopiecki (2000 FIDE), a regular attendee at New York’s Marshall Chess Club Tournaments.  He had gained my attention the previous weekend when he yelled out to a friend “I beat Bonin!” (one of the more senior players at the Marshall Chess Club) in the middle of a round 🙂 .  I won my game fairly quickly,  but what transpired at the end was hilarious!  After I played Qxc4, which effectively sealed the game since Ed was a Rook down, he just sat there without moving.  About 15 minutes later when Ed’s Board 4 resigned and was walking past him, Ed began an amusing convo with his friend while it was still his Move.  Here is the transcript 🙂

Kopiecki: ” Where are you going?!”

Board 4 Friend: “I’m going out to lunch.”

Kopeicki: Stands up and says “Oh, well wait for me, I wanna come with you! Let me just resign.”

Board 4 Friend: “Did you resign yet ?”

Kopiecki: Begins scouring notation sheet, and then looks up and says, “No.  Let me Resign.” He then looks at me and says, “I resign!”

All the team members stopped playing and were just following this conversation.  I couldn’t help laughing along with the other players, and was half-expecting Ed to say “Rematch at Marshall’s!”

R1 - Ed Kopiecki and Akshat Chandra on Board 1

R1 : Ed Kopiecki and Akshat Chandra on Board 1

Here’s the game:

We played Hamilton Chess Club in the next round.  I was playing White against FM Boris Privman (2197 FIDE).  The game was extremely long and enervating, and lasted for 6 hours into the night.  But in the end I prevailed.  It wasn’t the best game from my side at all, as I could have ended the game much earlier.  Our Board 3 and Board 4 Won as well, while our Board 2 Drew.  So we won the match 3.5-0.5.

R2 : Akshat Chandra and Boris Privman

R2 : Akshat Chandra and Boris Privman

In the 3rd round we played a team from Florida, Kingside Crushers, and I faced their Board 1, Jeffery Haskel (2224 FIDE).  He employed an extremely sharp line with 5.g3, which led to a rich and complex middlegame.  However, a hasty central advance by him in the early middlegame tipped the scale to my side irrevocably.  My c8 Bishop, which was shut-in most of the game, was the hero in the end 🙂

R3 : Akshat Chandra and Jeffrey Haskel

R3 : Akshat Chandra and Jeffrey Haskel

So halfway into the tournament, we were tied for the lead with 3-0.  I liked the way I had played my 3rd round , but still wasn’t satisfied with my overall play.  In the 4th round, we played the team Nobody 🙂 , and I was White against Robert M Perez, a talented junior on Board 1.

R4 : Akshat Chandra and Robert Perez

R4 : Akshat Chandra and Robert Perez

I made an inaccuracy early on, and was slightly worse after 20 moves.  Being worse as White after 20 moves is hardly ideal.  But Chess is not all about attacking and winning; you have to be good at defending worse positions as well.  I was able to do just that, and was expecting Robert to go for a Drawn rook endgame, when he suddenly took a daring risk trying to Win.  When the smoke cleared and we reached 40 moves, the first time control, I emerged with what was a probably winning Queen Endgame.  Nonetheless, I decided to Draw since that would end the match in our favor 2.5, irrespective of the outcome for the remaining game on Board 2.  Final score was 2.5 to 1.5.

Making such mistakes early on was not acceptable.  I needed to rectify that immediately, considering that I was going to play a stronger player on the final day.  

In Round 5, we were paired against Chess Kings & Queens 1 (GM Magesh’s Chess Academy). They’d the same 2197 team rating average as us.  On Board 1 I was playing  none other than GM Magesh Panchanathan (2557 FIDE).  In an exchange g3 Gruenfeld, GM Magesh decided to sharpen things up by playing 10.e4 !?.  So I was up a Pawn a few moves later, but my pieces weren’t that developed.  Some inaccuracies from Magesh’s side allowed me to consolidate, and I started to play for a Win.  But a really boneheaded 22nd move vaporized all the promising possibilities, and it was I who was now fighting for a Draw.  The critical line was 22.Bxb5, Bxa8, Rxa8, after which I thought my c2 Knight would be trapped; but it manages to wiggle out in all lines.  So in a span of 3 moves, I went from being a Pawn up and playing for a Win, to being a Pawn down and fighting for a Draw – Dang 🙂 .

R5 : GM Magesh Panchanathan and Akshat Chandra

R5 : GM Magesh Panchanathan and Akshat Chandra

Magesh was down to only 2 minutes however, and we were still 14 moves away from the time control.  He played very accurately despite the time pressure, up until his 40th move.  At that point he played 40.Be2 allowing me to equalize immediately. Things were looking like an easy Draw now, when suddenly I blundered with 53.Ra5 ??. Ke5 kept things in balance, since after g4 I have Ra4 !, which is what I missed.  I was now losing by force, and was getting ready to resign, since I expected Magesh to play 60.Rb8.  But Magesh made the reflex 60.Rh6 ??, and after Rxb5!, I’m able to draw due to a stalemate trick if he takes on h5 !  We played a 2 vs 1 for some moves, which is an easy Draw, but I was down to my final minute.  On move 80, when I was down to only 26 seconds, the classy GM Magesh offered me a Draw, displaying great sportsmanship for what was technically a Drawn game.  That’s a real chess player right there.  You rock Magesh!  Like two gladiators, we fought to the end trying our best to Win, but eventually agreed to a Draw after ~6 1/2 hours.  The final team score was 3 to 1, in our favor.

Now going into the final round, there were only 2 teams at a full 5-0.  It was us, What does the GM Say?…, and last year’s winner Princeton A.  Due to my long game earlier, I had about 10 minutes to eat, relax and get ready for this crucial and decisive round.  I was to face Princeton University’s Board 1 Michael Lee (2388 FIDE), and I had a double-black.  Princeton A had a team average of about 2197, so we were evenly matched.  Michael chose an extremely strange opening line, deviating from his usual 1.c4.  After the center closed up, we began our flank operations with Michael advancing on the Kingside, while I tried opening things up on the Queenside.  An erroneous recapture by him on move 21, gave me an advantage which I didn’t relinquish for the rest of the game.  I missed ways to Win quicker which was disheartening since they weren’t so difficult.  But I still played accurately without giving the Princeton University star any chance to make amends.  I was still pretty happy to have gone 5/6  on Board 1 in the tournament against good opposition, despite making quite a few mistakes.

R6 : Michael Lee and Akshat Chandra

R6 : Michael Lee and Akshat Chandra

But winning my game was not enough,  On Board 2, Grant Xu beat the other experienced Princeton player Andrew Ng.  Unfortunately for us, winning on top 2 boards didn’t Win us the tournament.  This time our bottom two boards lost to Princeton University A.  So the match score was 2-2, a tie.  Princeton A and us, What does the GM say?, had tied for 1st place at 5.5/6 points each in the US Amateur Championship East – 2014.  We were joined by a veteran team On the Rohde Again, which had won their last round.  So this was a 3-way tie for first place.

On tie break, which added points from all matches, Princeton University A was awarded the title, and we were given the 2nd rank.  That was sad, since I felt that our team had a tougher path to tying for 1st as we beat Princeton’s strong top two Boards while they beat our lower two boards.  I would have preferred a US Championship or US Chess League style tie-break – a Blitz match, possibly starting at Board 1 or Board 4, and moving on to next player, till the final winner is left.  Ah well, such is life 🙂 .  We took comfort that last year Champions Princeton University couldn’t beat us and that we’d almost turned the tables. I congratulate Princeton A on their win, and their historic back-to-back achievement.  Maybe we get to play for the National title, in case Princeton A is unable show up 🙂 .  Perhaps one day I’ll go play alongside these smart players at their historic University since they’re not far from home.

Overall it was a fun experience, and I’m glad that we tied for 1st, and came 2nd on tiebreak, in what was an extremely strong team tournament. On all boards, our team members came through when it counted most.

Great job Grant, Sid and Jason!

I’d like to thank and appreciate the effort of the organizers to flawlessly host a tournament of this magnitude.

Who Dat tied for first?  What does the GM say,  That’s Who! 😉

Flanked by Twin Towers!  Siddharth Arun, Akshat Chandra, Grant Xu, after the final round. (Jason Tang had already left)

Flanked by Twin Towers!
Siddharth Arun, Akshat Chandra, Grant Xu, after the final round (Jason Tang had already left)

3 thoughts on “Tying for First at The US Amateur Team East 2014

  1. Jefferey

    Good tournament, Akshat! You guys deserved to win! I think you could have played on without much risk against Perez, but I understand why you took the draw. I look forward to beating you on ICC, your friend, Jefferey.

  2. The Bee

    In future please have your team contact myself for guidance on how to make an acceptable team name…


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *